Why Do Republicans Keep Supporting War?

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 0.0/7 (0 votes cast)

As the country continues to accumulate unprecedented and unsustainable debt levels, some Republicans are beginning to question why we’re still fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

While largely supportive of President George Bush’s objectives for invading both countries after 9/11, our expensive and confusingly-defined presence a decade later confounds many on the right. Should we continue expending American lives and spending billions of dollars on nation-building exercises in Muslim countries which are culturally incompatible to democracy?

Some Republicans are even joining the harsh war critics on the left in questioning the initial justification for attacking Iraq. While Saddam Hussein’s possession, use and ongoing efforts to procure weapons of mass destruction (WMD) is the 80′s was well known, large quantities of chemical weapons had been located and destroyed after the 1991 Persian Gulf War.

Despite UN Inspector Hans Blix’s report that he had found no stockpiles of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, the US invaded Iraq in 2003, citing the WMD threat as a primary justification. When no WMD were found, Bush admitted to lapses in military intelligence but maintained that his decision was sound, stating:

“But what wasn’t wrong was Saddam Hussein had invaded a country, he had used weapons of mass destruction, he had the capability of making weapons of mass destruction, he was firing at our pilots. He was a state sponsor of terror. Removing Saddam Hussein was the right thing for world peace and the security of our country.”

Many liberals and some conservatives aren’t convinced that the intelligence was flawed, and suspect the WMD threat was deliberately overstated to solidify support for the war. Similar to President Lyndon Johnson’s use of the alleged second attack on the USS Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin as a pretext for initiating war with North Vietnam, many question Bush’s honesty.

The question of whether the US should invade a foreign country and dictate how that country governs itself is extremely controversial, regardless of your politics. Especially now, when we’re drowning in debt and need all available resources to ensure that our democracy remains intact.

It’s informative to recall the 60′s when the US was embroiled in the civil rights struggle, with race riots regularly erupting on the streets. Did any foreign power invade in order to install a fair and just society?

No. We resolved our differences ourselves.

There’s a lesson there somewhere.

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 0.0/7 (0 votes cast)

What’s Happening In Wisconsin?

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 0.0/7 (0 votes cast)

What's happening in Wisconsin?

So, after the 14 AWOL Democrat state senators returned from Illinois, the demonstrators left the capitol building and Governor Scott Walker’s “Wisconsin Budget Repair Bill” was signed into law, things have returned to normal in the Badger State, right?Hardly.

As you may recall, in early 2011 Governor Walker proposed a bill requiring most state employees to contribute 12.6% toward their health care premiums and 5.8% of their salaries toward their pensions in an effort to reign in the state’s $3.6 billion budget shortfall. The proposal also called for employees to relinquish collective bargaining rights for non-salary issues (though wages would still be subject to collectively bargaining), and forbade the automatic withdrawal of union dues from employee paychecks.

Since the legislation was signed into law on March 11, Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi issued both a temporary restraining order and a permanent injunction barring it from going into effect. Her judicial overreach was overturned by the Wisconsin Supreme Court on June 14, reinstating the law which some experts estimate will save the state $300 million in its first year.

Undeterred by this series of setbacks, Wisconsin Democrats have instituted a new strategy: recall elections.

Petitions are being circulated for the recall of six Republican state senators (who hold a 19/14 Senate majority), and a massive effort to recall Government Walker will start in November. Despite the state’s perilous financial situation, the Democrats are determined to regain power through any means necessary, and reinstitute many of the irresponsible policies that lead to this fiscal crisis.

Interestingly, none other than Franklin Delano Roosevelt recognized the inherent conflict-of-interest public sector unions represent. He understood that, since government workers don’t generate profits, they don’t negotiate for a higher percentage of what they help create. They simply seek a greater share of taxpayer money, which FDR considered “unthinkable and intolerable”.

It’s especially unthinkable and intolerable in a state with a $3.6 billion budget deficit.

So, what should the citizens of Wisconsin do to thwart the Democrat’s and union’s efforts to fully restore these unaffordable public sector benefit packages?

Voting for every Republican incumbent in the upcoming recall elections is a good place to start.

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 0.0/7 (0 votes cast)