Government Employees Double-Dipping

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 2.7/7 (3 votes cast)

Double Dipping Wisconsin
For those of you who love government and just can’t fathom the thought that government can do no wrong, here’s a little tidbit that should make you think twice.

Government employees in Wisconsin are double-dipping.

You see, it’s been common practice for those slurping off the public trough (not the website) to retire from their jobs, collect their pension, then within one month and a day, return to their former government employment to collect their payroll and pension simultaneously.

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker seeks to end this practice for good, however union advocates, as part of their “Walker is destroying Wisconsin” campaign, want this practice to continue, and at all costs, including a recall election against the republican governor.

As reported in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, “The latest case, reported by the Green Bay Press-Gazette, involved Associate Provost (University of Wisconsin-Green Bay) Timothy Sewall, who retired from his job in March — when the Legislature was reducing benefits for public employees — and was hired back a month later to his $110,000 position. After his rehire, he was still collecting his $44,000 pension.”

The “latest” case? How pervasive is this practice in government?

It doesn’t take a staunch liberal activist to figure out that government entities have been blatantly taking care of themselves at the expense of over-burdened taxpayers in Wisconsin. And to no one’s surprise, these employees hate Walker for attempting to take nirvana away from them. Liberals just don’t want to admit it to anyone else but their brood.

Which “working class family” do the unions support? That’s right, the family of government officials who make this all possible for the government working class elite, funded entirely by those bad corporations and their employees . . . by law.

Crooked thinking is what’s been damaging this country, and helping to put the private middle class in jeopardy and on the brink of extinction.

Legalized thievery. Unions. Inept and self-serving politicians. A recipe for the destruction of America. And it’s baking in your oven right now America.

Let that nutty, conservative, tea party revolution begin.

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 2.7/7 (3 votes cast)

Wisconsin Sees Continuing Improvements in the Economy

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 0.0/7 (0 votes cast)

WelWisc
Now that the effort to recall the six Republican state legislators who helped pass Wisconsin’s “Budget Repair Bill” has proven unsuccessful, and citizens are seeing the benefits of living in a state which is fiscally responsible and business- friendly, optimism is growing throughout the state.

State Senator Rich Zipperer recently chronicled several reasons for this optimism in a 9/21/11 column emailed to his constituents. The Republican representing Wisconsin’s 33rd district listed a number of significant accomplishments the budget bill brought about:

 

  • Balanced the state budget while holding the line on taxes, eliminating a $3 billion deficit in the process.
  • Instated permanent property tax caps for the first time in Wisconsin’s history.
  • Rooted out millions in waste from state government.
  • Improved the security of elections with photo I.D. for voting legislation.
  • Transformed the bureaucratic Department of Commerce into the more nimble Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation.
  • Reformed the state’s legal system, allowing job creators to operate without squandering millions on frivolous litigation.

Employers have noticed the steps Wisconsin has taken to position itself for long-term economic growth, and are becoming optimistic as well. Zipperer outlined dramatic improvements in employer attitudes toward the state:

Wisconsin improved four spots on CNBC’s “top states for business” list this year, an overwhelming 88 percent of the state’s business leaders surveyed by Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce approve of the direction the state is heading, and, according to CEO Magazine, we are now the nation’s 24th best state to do business in – 17 spots higher from 2010.

Not everyone shares Zipperer’s enthusiasm, however. Despite the futility and expense of the senatorial recall effort (which cost state and local governments over $2.1 million), the Democrats will attempt to recall Governor Scott Walker in November.

Plus, many Democrat-controlled counties and municipalities plan to meet mandated spending reductions by cutting critical Fire and Sheriff Department budgets instead of trimming non-essential services. In doing so, the Democrats and their union supporters hope to convince voters that the Governor’s budget cuts are a threat to public safety.

Having experienced many of the tangible benefits cited by Zipperer, the public isn’t buying this argument. If only the democrats and unions recognized this new reality …

A useless and costly gubernatorial recall election could be avoided.

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 0.0/7 (0 votes cast)

The Latest from Wisconsin’s Recall Efforts after the Budget Repair Bill

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 6.0/7 (1 vote cast)

Now that Wisconsin’s highly controversial “Budget Repair Bill” has gone into effect, how are school districts throughout the state getting along?As you may recall, Governor Scott Walker proposed a bill requiring most state employees to contribute 12.6% toward their health care premiums and 5.8% of their salaries toward their pensions in an effort to reign in the state’s $3.6 billion budget shortfall. The proposal also called for employees to relinquish collective bargaining rights for non-salary issues, and forbade the automatic withdrawal of union dues from employee paychecks.

So, have the horrors that the 14 Democratic senators who fled to Illinois and the thousands of protesters who converged on the state capitol feared been realized?

Not so much.

In the Kaukauna School District, officials estimate that they will turn a $400,000 deficit into a $1.5 million surplus. In addition to the savings generated by teachers now contributing to their healthcare coverage and pensions, the school board was able to drastically reduce the district’s healthcare costs.

The previous collective bargaining agreement required that the district purchase health insurance from the WEA Trust, which is owned by the Wisconsin Education Association Council (WEAC), and was threatening significant premium increases. Now able to shop around, school officials found a much cheaper provider.

Kaukauna plans to use the freed-up funds to hire additional teachers and implement merit pay. This will enable administrators to reduce class sizes and increase one-on-one instruction for troubled and special needs students.

The fact that WEAC is no longer allowed to automatically withdraw union dues from its members’ paychecks (roughly $1000 per year) has been well received by many teachers. They not only appreciate the positive cash flow, they enjoy the political freedom. Not every teacher is a Democrat, after all.

Not surprisingly, the automatic withdraw restrictions have posed challenges to WEAC, which must now pursue dues collection through meetings, emails and phone calls. Interestingly, IRS filings revealed that the union collected $23.4 million in dues from its 98,000 members in 2009. Further, the organization paid its 151 employees $14,382,812 that year. That’s 61% of all dues collected and averages $95,250 per WEAC employee.

No wonder the union bitterly fought limits to non-salary collective bargaining and automatic dues withdrawals.

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 6.0/7 (1 vote cast)

What’s Happening In Wisconsin?

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 0.0/7 (0 votes cast)

What's happening in Wisconsin?

So, after the 14 AWOL Democrat state senators returned from Illinois, the demonstrators left the capitol building and Governor Scott Walker’s “Wisconsin Budget Repair Bill” was signed into law, things have returned to normal in the Badger State, right?Hardly.

As you may recall, in early 2011 Governor Walker proposed a bill requiring most state employees to contribute 12.6% toward their health care premiums and 5.8% of their salaries toward their pensions in an effort to reign in the state’s $3.6 billion budget shortfall. The proposal also called for employees to relinquish collective bargaining rights for non-salary issues (though wages would still be subject to collectively bargaining), and forbade the automatic withdrawal of union dues from employee paychecks.

Since the legislation was signed into law on March 11, Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi issued both a temporary restraining order and a permanent injunction barring it from going into effect. Her judicial overreach was overturned by the Wisconsin Supreme Court on June 14, reinstating the law which some experts estimate will save the state $300 million in its first year.

Undeterred by this series of setbacks, Wisconsin Democrats have instituted a new strategy: recall elections.

Petitions are being circulated for the recall of six Republican state senators (who hold a 19/14 Senate majority), and a massive effort to recall Government Walker will start in November. Despite the state’s perilous financial situation, the Democrats are determined to regain power through any means necessary, and reinstitute many of the irresponsible policies that lead to this fiscal crisis.

Interestingly, none other than Franklin Delano Roosevelt recognized the inherent conflict-of-interest public sector unions represent. He understood that, since government workers don’t generate profits, they don’t negotiate for a higher percentage of what they help create. They simply seek a greater share of taxpayer money, which FDR considered “unthinkable and intolerable”.

It’s especially unthinkable and intolerable in a state with a $3.6 billion budget deficit.

So, what should the citizens of Wisconsin do to thwart the Democrat’s and union’s efforts to fully restore these unaffordable public sector benefit packages?

Voting for every Republican incumbent in the upcoming recall elections is a good place to start.

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 0.0/7 (0 votes cast)

Why Did University Of Wisconsin Students Support Union Protests?

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 0.0/7 (0 votes cast)
The budget showdown between Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker and public sector employees was intense and confrontational. But was it educational? And, why did so many students from the University of Wisconsin choose to participate in the demonstrations and union protests?

First, a little background. After campaigning as a fiscal conservative who would take the steps necessary to reign in state spending, Scott Walker was elected Governor of Wisconsin on November 2, 2010. In addition, the election resulted in a 19/14 Republican majority in the state senate (which consisted of 18 Democrats and 15 Republicans previously), and a 60/38/1 Republican majority in the state house (which had been 50/45 Democrat with two independents and two vacant seats). Clearly, the electorate favored spending restraint.

In order to address the state’s $3.6 billion budget shortfall, Governor Walker proposed the Wisconsin Budget Repair Bill which required that most state employees contribute 12.6% toward their health care premiums and 5.8% of their salaries toward their pensions (public-sector health care premiums and pension contributions were fully funded by Wisconsin taxpayers previously). The proposal also called for state employees to relinquish collective bargaining rights for non-salary issues.

Walker argued that the requested health care contributions were half the national average, the pension contributions were at the national average, and the curtailment of collective bargaining rights was necessary since “fringe benefits” made up over 25% of school district expenditures. Further, if these give-backs weren’t achieved, he would be forced to lay off 1500 state employees.

When Walker wouldn’t compromise on limits to collective bargaining, the 14 Democratic senators fled to Illinois to deny a senate quorum, and massive demonstrations ensued in Madison. Among the thousands of protesters who converged on the state capitol were hundreds of University of Wisconsin students.

While it’s understandable that professors and other public sector employees would demonstrate against reductions to their take-home pay, what motivated the students to brave the cold and protest? Did their instructors compel them? Did the unions induce them? Were their parents union members? Or, were they simply bored and looking for something exciting to do?

As reported on 2/23/2011 at www.dailylocal.com, many students stood with the union members.

“I’m just supporting the state workers,” said Katie Annunzio, a senior at UW. “Even though I’m from Illinois, if the teachers got their rights taken away, I’d be upset.”

“Frankly, these plans are going to gut our university system,” said Jonathan Mertzig, a UW grad now working in the private sector. “I can’t sit idly by while the plan ruins other people’s chances to get a decent education in this state.”

Other students weren’t as sympathetic, especially when the protests were seen as hindering their education. As reported on 2/22/2011 at host.madison.com, UW Junior Matt Payne wrote the following in the student newspaper:

For the past week, UW students have been subjected to cancelled classes, teaching assistants missing from office hours and megaphone-bearing organizers disrupting classes to encourage students to participate in protests.

In the end, we all love UW, no matter where you stand on Walker’s budget repair bill. But, I for one will choose to express that love by continuing to attend class and not disrupt those around me who wish to do the same.

Public rights, private rights, the right to assemble, a constitutional mandate that the state’s budget must be balanced … large issues all.

If nothing else, it’s quite an educational opportunity.

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Please rate this article (No need to sign up)
Rating: 0.0/7 (0 votes cast)